首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates
【2h】

Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates

机译:土地利用的不确定性,破坏模型和淹没深度对洪水破坏估算的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

With the recent transition to a more risk-based approach in flood management, flood risk models-being a key component in flood risk management-are becoming increasingly important. Such models combine information from four components: (1) the flood hazard (mostly inundation depth), (2) the exposure (e.g. land use), (3) the value of elements at risk and (4) the susceptibility of the elements at risk to hydrologic conditions (e.g. depth-damage curves). All these components contain, however, a certain degree of uncertainty which propagates through the calculation and accumulates in the final damage estimate. In this study, an effort has been made to assess the influence of uncertainty in these four components on the final damage estimate. Different land-use data sets and damage models have been used to represent the uncertainties in the exposure, value and susceptibility components. For the flood hazard component, inundation depth has been varied systematically to estimate the sensitivity of flood damage estimations to this component. The results indicate that, assuming the uncertainty in inundation depth is about 25 cm (about 15% of the mean inundation depth), the total uncertainty surrounding the final damage estimate in the case study area can amount to a factor 5-6. The value of elements at risk and depth-damage curves are the most important sources of uncertainty in flood damage estimates and can both introduce about a factor 2 of uncertainty in the final damage estimates. Very large uncertainties in inundation depth would be necessary to have a similar effect on the uncertainty of the final damage estimate, which seem highly unrealistic. Hence, in order to reduce the uncertainties surrounding potential flood damage estimates, these components deserve prioritisation in future flood damage research. While absolute estimates of flood damage exhibit considerable uncertainty (the above-mentioned factor 5-6), estimates for proportional changes in flood damages (defined as the change in flood damages as a percentage of a base situation) are much more robust. © 2010 The Author(s).
机译:随着近来向洪水管理中基于风险的方法的转变,作为洪水风险管理的关键组成部分的洪水风险模型变得越来越重要。这样的模型结合了来自四个组成部分的信息:(1)洪水灾害(主要是淹没深度);(2)暴露(例如土地利用);(3)处于危险中的元素的价值;(4)处于危险中的元素的敏感性水文状况的风险(例如,深度-破坏曲线)。但是,所有这些成分都包含一定程度的不确定性,这些不确定性会通过计算传播并累积到最终的损坏估算中。在这项研究中,已努力评估这四个组成部分的不确定性对最终损害估计的影响。已经使用了不同的土地利用数据集和破坏模型来表示暴露,价值和敏感性成分的不确定性。对于洪水灾害组成部分,系统地改变了淹没深度以估计洪水损害估计对此部分的敏感性。结果表明,假设淹没深度的不确定性约为25厘米(约为平均淹没深度的15%),那么案例研究区域中最终破坏估计的总不确定性可达到5-6倍。风险要素的值和深度-破坏曲线是洪水破坏估算中不确定性的最重要来源,并且在最终破坏估算中都可能引入约2的不确定性。为了使最终损害估计的不确定性具有类似的影响,淹没深度的很大不确定性将是必要的,这似乎是非常不现实的。因此,为了减少围绕潜在洪灾破坏估算的不确定性,这些组件应在未来洪灾破坏研究中优先考虑。虽然洪水破坏的绝对估计值显示出相当大的不确定性(上述5-6因子),但是洪水破坏的比例变化(定义为洪水破坏的变化占基本情况的百分比)的估计要可靠得多。 ©2010作者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号